Equalization and oil
Canadian Business Magazine
- July 9, 2001
http://www.aims.ca/Media/2001/prjul0901b.htm
An oily
arrangement
Robin Hood economics are robbing Nova Scotia blind
By Andrew
Nikiforuk
Nova Scotia's offshore
hydrocarbon reserves are so rich that people now joke that the province has
stopped being a hewer of wood — and become a passer of gas. But Nova Scotia,
home to great offshore natural gas deposits, is suffering more gas pain than
gain, thanks to Ottawa.
For every dollar of
royalties the province reaps from offshore gas, it keeps only 19˘. The rest
goes to Jean Chrétien and his crew. That means that over the next 30 years,
Nova Scotia will bank only about $6 billion from a projected $36-billion gas
fortune.
The money grab has nothing
to do with greed and everything to do with the nation's Robin Hood equalization
policy. It allows the feds to take from rich provinces and give to poor
provinces to make Canada a land of happy equals, if not persistent Liberal
voters.
Policy-makers, however,
never counted on poor provinces like Nova Scotia and Newfoundland becoming rich
from oil and gas. In fact, the nation's equalization formula — a nifty
calculation when things are bad — turns into a regular millstone when the
economy perks up, as Nova Scotia is now discovering. Like some perverse welfare
scheme, equalization demands that Nova Scotia and Newfoundland (projected to
produce about 40% of the nation's conventional oil) cough back 70% to 100% of
their oil and gas revenue in clawbacks. It also takes a look at rising real
estate and labor prices that accompany economic growth and makes another federal
subtraction.
"Here we have the
least well-off provinces trying to seize a chance to become less reliant on
Ottawa, and Ottawa is preventing that from happening," notes Brian Lee
Crowley, president of the Halifax-based Atlantic Institute for Market Studies
(AIMS). With his aptly named "Campaign for Fairness," Nova Scotia
Premier John Hamm has made the same point — and even recruited Alberta's Ralph
Klein to support his province's crusade to keep its gas wealth.
Last month, AIMS released
two damning papers that document just how equalization has entrenched inequality
in Atlantic Canada. One, by Roland Martin, a former deputy minister of finance
in Newfoundland, notes that after 44 years and $180 billion in transfer
payments, the four Atlantic provinces are no more self-sufficient today than
when equality arrived in the form of big federal cheques. In fact, Nova Scotia's
dependence on handouts from Ottawa has climbed from $596.4 million to $1.26
billion in constant dollars in the past 15 years.
Another paper, by Calgary
policy researcher Kenneth Boessenkool, proposes a solution to this welfare trap:
just remove oil and gas revenue from Ottawa's equalization formula. That way,
poor provinces would have a greater incentive to develop their oil and gas to
build self-reliant economies, pay off their debts, lower equalization payments
and become mini-Albertas.
That prospect, however,
might not sit well with Ottawa. The current scheme has the benefit of making
poor regions politically indebted to the federal Liberals as well as reluctant
allies in constitutional battles. Crowley has even heard tales about bureaucrats
saying "they don't want another Alberta on their hands." But he
believes the whole equalization boondoggle is just an unintentional lack of
foresight, a habitual ailment in the capital.
Whatever the case, it's
time for Ottawa to unshackle the provinces and get smarter about giving money
away and clawing it back. Canada could use a few more independent-minded
provinces like Alberta. And Nova Scotia knows from Alberta's experience that you
can't become an equal without being a master in your own house.