GAY MEDIA
C&F
Report : September 18, 2002
http://cultureandfamily.org/e/report/2002-09-18/n_nlgja.shtml
‘Gay
Journalists’ Conference Marked by Homosexual Activism
By Peter J.
LaBarbera
News analysis Part One
PHILADELPHIA
— In a media atmosphere of increasingly one-sided coverage about
homosexuality-related issues, a national conference for homosexual journalists
betrayed its members’ deep commitment to "gay" ideology. The 12
annual conference of the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA)
— attended by about 500 media professionals and activists — featured ample
opportunities for pro-"gay" opinion-molders to press their perspective
to the assembled journalists. But only one plenary session included speakers who
could be called vocal critics of "gay" activism — FOX News’ Bill
O’ Reilly and conservative Philadelphia radio talk show host Michael
Smerconish. (Neither are principled opponents of "gay rights": lately,
O’ Reilly has embraced positions such as "sexual orientation" laws;
Smerconish, who announced his support for including homosexual "civil
unions" notices in newspaper wedding pages, was a substitute for Tucker
Carlson, co-host of CNN ’s Crossfire, who was a no-show.)
All
other panels, including two on the Catholic Church’s sex abuse scandal, were
bereft of traditional pro-family voices. This might be expected for a homosexual
activist organization, but the NLGJA insists it is not one of those but rather a
professional group like other minority media associations such as the National
Association of Black Journalists. Critics contend it is a distinction without
much of a difference.
Since
the 9-11 terror attacks, the NLGJA has not been shy about engaging in
run-of-the-mill homosexual advocacy, for example: • It successfully lobbied
The New York Times to include homosexual "civil union" announcements
on its "weddings" page; • The NLGJA lobbied news organizations to
make more prominent references to the alleged homosexuality of 9-11 victims and
"heroes" like Mark Bingham, who was a passenger in the United Flight
93 jet that went down outside Pittsburgh; • It urged journalists not to
connect the adult male-boy sex scandal in the Catholic Church to homosexuals
(including recommending that reporters quote the most "gay"-friendly
sex "expert" available, Dr. Fred Berlin); • In a
"Stylebook" for journalists, defining "sexual orientation"
as "innate" despite evidence proving that contention.
This
writer has attended or sent reporters to at least half of the NLGJA’s previous
11 conferences. This year, as before, homosexual activists from groups like
GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) and the Human Rights
Campaign were on hand to chat up journalists. Several homosexual activists
appeared on panels, including:
•
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) in a panel on Islam and homosexuality; •
GLAAD’s Cathy Renna; • Noemi Perez of LLEGO (National Latina/o Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual and Transgender Organization) • Homosexual academics John D’Emilio
and Larry Gross, both harsh critics of religious traditionalists.
The
NLGJA’s membership is split between members of the "gay" advocacy
media, such as The Washington Blade and public television’s homosexual program
In the Life, and members who work in "mainstream" media companies like
The Washington Post. At this and previous conferences, it was the
"advocacy" NLGJA members who voiced the most extreme viewpoints
regarding media coverage of conservative groups opposed to "gay
rights." (Last year, I was called a "walking hate crime" by sex
radical and writer Kirk Read.)
FLAT
EARTH SOCIETY? On Friday, there was a plenary session featuring Bill O’Reilly
(who appeared on a large screen via satellite from Seattle) titled, "Is
There a Liberal Bias in the News?" The panel barely dealt with what I
believe should have been its central focus: journalists both homosexual and
non-homosexual who skew their reporting by quoting "gay" activists and
not pro-family representatives. I went to the audience microphone to ask if
there was any justification for this practice. The moderator, Ramon Escobar of
NBC and Telemundo, asked me a question about Mark Bingham and whether it was
appropriate to report on his homosexuality. I said it could be but that it would
not be fair if Bingham received disproportionate media coverage compared to
other 9-11 victims due to the "gay" angle. Earlier, Jon Barrett of the
homosexual magazine The Advocate, who wrote a book about Bingham, said there was
no "confirmed" evidence that Bingham had heroically charged the
cockpit on the flight, unlike Todd Beamer and others whose cell phone calls made
clear what they were about to do.
After
I sat down, a man approached the microphone and asked sardonically that if
someone was doing a story on the space shuttle, "would you be obligated to
get a quote from the Flat Earth Society?" Every year, NLGJA members make
such comparisons between natural family advocates who oppose homosexuality and
sinister retrograde forces. Usually, it’s the KKK or some other racist fringe
group. Such is the contempt with which many homosexual advocates hold people of
faith who oppose "gay rights." What has changed in recent years is the
increasing regularity of "mainstream" media stories dealing with
controversial "gay" topics that contain zero or only token opposing
viewpoints critical of homosexual activism.
A
prime example was published recently in The Washington Post on the Metropolitan
Community Church’s Cathedral of Hope — a church founded for homosexuals —
in Dallas, Texas. In a long piece flowing off the front page of the Sunday,
August 25 Post, veteran reporter Lee Hockstader included only one paragraph
quoting a critic of the homosexual church: " The Sunday mornings are not
always peaceful: The Christian right and anti-gay groups have trained their ire
on the church, picketing outside and occasionally infiltrating the sanctuary to
shout slogans. 'I'd call it a synagogue of Satan,' said John Reyes, head of the
Dallas office of Operation Rescue/Operation Save America. 'It's a
monstrosity'."
Despite
the highly controversial nature of a church built around the affirmation of
behavior regarded as sin throughout thousands of years of Judeo-Christian
history, Hockstader did not include a single comment from an orthodox theologian
or church leader critical of the MCC (which, as C&F Report recently
reported, sponsors sadistic sex events at some of its branches across the
country.) It would be hard to conceive of Hockstader or The Post treating Rev.
Jerry Falwell’s Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Virginia with such
kid gloves.
The
Post thus advanced the larger homosexual activist goal of drawing a moral
equivalence between traditional Christian (and religious) teachings and those of
"gay" revisionist denominations such as the MCC that turn a historic
beliefs on their head. In the same way, "gay" media activists posit
moral equivalence between normal, male-female couples and homosexual partners,
even though most Americans still see a huge difference between the two. A
central goal of the NLGJA and homosexual activist groups is the nonchalant
inclusion of homosexuals and "gay" couples in media stories that have
nothing do with homosexuality, thereby helping to "mainstream"
homosexuality in the culture.
Hockstader
apparently is not a member of the NLGJA, illustrating that biased
"gay"-related stories are just as likely to come from
non-"gay" journalists as from open homosexuals in the media. However,
for years, NLGJA members have testified to the powerful effect they have as open
advocates in the newsroom — especially as a "source" on stories
dealing with homosexuality. In these politically correct times, many reporters
do not want to be perceived as "intolerant" or "judgmental,"
and the presence of proud, "gay" co-workers serves as a potent check
on their reporting.
Meanwhile,
well-funded homosexual media watchdogs like GLAAD are more than happy to
"summarize" their opponents’ viewpoint to compliant journalists so
that they don’t actually have to solicit comments from traditional morality
advocates like Concerned Women for America. Who can imagine GLAAD allowing its
perspective to be "summarized" by CWA?
POWERFUL
CORPORATE SPONSORS As always, media companies recruited at the NLGJA event and
funded the event by sponsoring various sessions. The following were among the
corporations sponsoring this year’s conference, coupled with congratulatory
slogans in their ads in the conference program:
FOX
News Network ("…honors the commitment of NLGJA to promote fair and
balanced reporting.")
CNN ("We salute the NLGJA for its efforts to foster diversity and fairness
in journalism.")
Microsoft
ABC News ("Where diversity spells progress’) >Newsweek
("…salutes the [NLGJA]and supports your goals of ending discrimination
against all minorities.")
The Washington Post
U.S. Newswire
AOL Time Warner ("…We continue to salute your efforts to foster diversity
in journalism….")
American Express
Coca-Cola Company ("..proudly salutes the [NLGJA].")
NBC
Time Inc.
The Mercury News
QVC
Dow Jones & Co.
The New York Times Co.
Bloomberg News
Gannett Foundation ("Diversity, Fairness, Respect are our
passengers.")
American Airlines ("…is proud to serve as the official airline of the
NLGJA.")