STRAIGHT DEFINITIONS FOR GAYS

HOMOSEXUALS HAVE EASTER BUNNY IN THEIR SIGHTS
By Don Feder
April 24, 2006

To understand the meaning of the gay invasion of this year's White House Easter Egg Roll, let me ask you a pointed question: Would you use your children to make a political point? Would you shlep your kids somewhere to help advance an agenda?

On Monday, an estimated 100 "gay families" descended on the White House lawn, kiddies in tow. The annual event is open to the first 1,000 families in line.

This street theater came to us courtesy of Mel White (self-styled "militant gay activist") who's into using his cadre to crash Christian colleges and churches that dissent from the happy (gay) cause. Protestors wore rainbow colored Hawaiian leis to identify themselves. For them to been there without being in our face would have served no useful purpose.

Organizers disingenuously claimed they were not playing politics, and - in the same breath -- admitted that's exactly what they were doing.

"We not protesting the president's policies on gay families, said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Pride (the force behind the rainbow putsch). "We are, however, helping him understand that gay families exist in this country (he didn't know that?) and deserve rights and protections that all families need."

Oh, and what would those rights and protections be - lifestyle indoctrination in the schools, allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the military, abolishing the few remaining barriers to gay adoption, sticking a finger in the eye of state voters who've adopted defense of marriage amendments, harassing the Catholic Church for refusing to place adoptive children with the rainbow families, crushing dissent from gay dogma, and the deconstruction of marriage - little stuff like that?

First, let's get our definitions straight.

A families is a man and a woman joined by marriage, with or without children. Two male homosexuals, or two lesbians, who are roommates, engaging in mutual acts of sodomy, aren't a family. Two homosexuals who have children are just that - two homosexuals who have children. They're no more a family than a fish with a machinegun is an army.

Homosexuals acquire children - through adoption, artificial insemination or from a previous marriage. And now they're using our natural sympathy for children as a weapon to normalize the abnormal - to put the healthy and life-giving on the same plane as the sick and life-negating.

While families sometimes adopt children, most men and women are capable of reproduction, and - even with widespread divorce -- most children live with their natural parents.

When was the last time you went to a homosexual baby shower? (But, I thought they were just like any other family.) In most cases, homosexuals can "have" children only if heterosexuals reproduce first.

Homosexuals generate not life but death. Forget AIDS. Every venereal disease imaginable is rampant among homosexuals. For homosexual "partners," monogamy doesn't mean quite the same thing it does for George and Laura. (In a 1978 study by gay researchers Jay and Young, 23% of homosexuals admitted to having had more than 100 sexual partners, while 18% said they'd had 3 or more in the previous week!) Family values, anyone?

While we're on the subject, homosexuals are far more likely to molest children than are individuals of the non-rainbow persuasion. In the Jay and Young study, 23% of homosexuals admitted to having had sex with children aged 13 to 15.

Consider reported cases of the sexual abuse of minors by priests. Over 80% involve same-sex encounters.

But, wait, if homosexuals are roughly 3% of the population, then shouldn't 97% of abusers be victimizing females? Don't heterosexual priests have the same access to girls that homosexual priests have to boys? Couldn't happy/rainbow priests have found adult partners? (The media coined the phrase "pedophile priests" to divert our attention. Homosexual priests would have been too descriptive - but more reflective of reality.)

Homosexuals are more sexually attracted to children than heterosexuals.

There is no organized movement among heterosexuals to abolish age of consent laws. There is no North American Man-Girl Love Association. The North American Man-Boy Love Association - NAMBLA (whose motto is "Sex Before 8, Or It's Too Late") - is well-represented in almost every gay-pride parade. Heterosexual males who prey on adolescent girls don't have a cute insider name for themselves. Gay pedophiles call themselves "chicken hawks."

Would you like to know just how much the gay-rights movement loves kids - how it puts the interests of children first? Then consider:

* Six years after the Supreme Court decision affirming the organization's right to adhere to its values, homosexuals are still trying to destroy the Boy Scouts - attempting to get United Way chapters to de-fund them and pressuring municipalities to end all association with the Scouts. Last year, they succeeded in ending the sponsorship of Scout chapters by military bases. There is no more effective organization for building character among adolescents than the Boy Scouts of America.

* The Salvation Army is also a target. In DC, activists have urged public officials to boycott the Army's kettle campaign, calling the best charity in America "homophobic group," for refusing to provide domestic-partner benefits. How many poor children have been helped by these notorious homophobes over the past 141 years?

* Because it refuses to place adoptive children with homosexuals, activists are going after Catholic Charities, the nation's largest provider of adoption services. They used a state anti-discrimination law to force the Church to stop doing placements in Massachusetts. The San Francisco City Council, a rubber-stamp for the movement, recently passed a resolution excoriating the Church for refusing to bow to the fashion of the times.

* Churches that adhere to Scriptural teaching might as well have bull's-eyes painted on their doors. In Europe and Canada, ministers have been prosecuted for proclaiming the Bible's truth about what Leviticus calls an "abomination." Activists' goal is to put churches that dissent from same-sex dogma out of business. If millions of children grow up without the word of God - that's a price militants are willing to pay to enforce their orthodoxy.

* The family is the crucible of civilization - a culture for growing healthy children with real values. Through gay "marriage," homosexuals are intent on destroying the family as we know it, with all of the social chaos that will ensue. After society is forced to treat same-sex couples as "families," we can move on to the legitimization of so-called group marriage. (HBO is presently laying down a polygamy propaganda barrage with its series "Big Love.")

When everything is a family, nothing will be a family - there will be nothing to distinguish the family from any arbitrary grouping of individuals. Driven by the same sexual revolution that fostered the gay rights movement, heterosexual cohabitation has risen steadily since the early 1970s. The same ethic of self (I am the sum of all things) encourages young adults not to form families or have children.

The movement will do anything (use anything) to advance its cause - even colored eggs and a tradition dating back to the presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes.

On New Year's Day, an eccentric British millionaire named Sharon Tendler married a dolphin at the Mediterranean resort of Eilat. If they can find a way to adopt, perhaps Mr. and Mrs. Flipper will be one of the rainbow families at next year's White House Easter-Egg Roll.

This article originally appeared at www.grasstopsusa.com