POLYGAMY TOO
TODAY'S
FAMILY NEWS - February 17, 2003
GAY MARRIAGE COULD
OPEN DOOR TO POLYGAMY, MPS WARN
"Tinkering"
with marriage by allowing homosexuals to legally marry could lead to the
legalization of polygamy in Canada, Liberal MP Pat O'Brien warned last week. In
an interview reported Friday in the Globe and Mail, O'Brien said that any
departure from the traditional definition of marriage as being between one man
and one woman to the exclusion of all others could open a Pandora's box of legal
and social problems. "Once you decide that a marriage between two men or a
marriage between two women is lawful, what's to say it can't be a man and two
women or a woman and five men?" he asked. O'Brien is a member of the
Commons Justice Committee which is holding public hearings in Ottawa on whether
or not to redefine marriage.
And
O'Brien is not alone in voicing these concerns. As the Ottawa Citizen reported,
Canadian Alliance MP and fellow committee member Vic Toews said that he too is
"very troubled" what could happen to the institution of marriage if it
was forced to conform strictly to the equality guarantees in the Charter of
Rights. "How could you deny a multiple partnership marriage?" he
asked. In testimony before the committee, Bruce Clemenger with the Evangelical
Fellowship of Canada predicted that others with a non-traditional view of
marriage will demand the same rights for themselves, if the law is changed to
allow homosexuals to marry. "Inevitably," he said, according to the
Citizen, "polygamists are going to ask: 'What about our orientation?'"
Bloc
Québécois MP Réal Ménard, who also sits on the committee as an acting
member, denounces this attempt by some MPs to "link" polygamy and gay
marriage. "It's vicious, it is not logical," he told the Toronto Star.
"Polygamy is not a Canadian value. It is obstruction." NDP MP Svend
Robinson agrees. "The hearings have too often been steeped in an atmosphere
that is abusive, hateful and full of, in a number instances, really disturbing
allegations about gay and lesbian people," he said in the Globe and Mail.
(On Thursday, Robinson introduced a private members bill - C-392 - that calls
for the legalization of gay marriage.)
But
it was not MPs who first suggested a connection between legalizing same-sex
marriage and legalizing polygamy. Under questioning by Liberal MP John McKay on
January 30, Law Commission of Canada president Nathalie Des Rosiers testified
that she saw nothing wrong in denying people the option of living in a
polygamous relationship. "...when you are in a society that says it has
equality of its citizens in front of the law, you must be able to justify why
you exclude some of them [from marrying]. That's where the debate is," she
said. Des Rosiers added: "In our view, what's interesting is that there is
no reason for why [polygamy] should be excluded."
Similar
concerns were also raised last week by the Alliance for Marriage and Family. It
is seeking permission to intervene in the case of a two-year-old boy in London,
Ontario. His parents, who do not live together, have asked a judge to grant his
mother's lesbian partner equal status as a parent. If approved, it would mark
the first time in Canada that a child had three legal parents.
"When
we say parents, we think of the mother and father who gave birth to a child,
unless you adopt and then a non-biological person assumes the obligations,"
Alliance lawyer Michael Menear told the London Free Press. "But if it's not
two [parents] and pushed by biology, where do you define the term? And if we
allow three parents, why not four. If four, why not 10?"
Focus
on the Family Canada is expected to testify before the Justice Committee
sometime in March.