US CULTURE

September 6, 2005  
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed090605a.cfm
 
Throwing Out the Thugs
"Women and children first."

This famous, selfless cry for the safety of others is best associated with  the tragedy of the Titanic, when thousands lost their lives in the frozen  waters of the sea so many years ago. Not unlike the rising waters in New  Orleans, where the ocean began to fill its natural territory after man-made  walls that held it back for so long failed, so the mighty waters of the  North Atlantic engulfed the damaged vessel that sought to defy nature's  icebergs and open waters. But, unlike New Orleans where dry land was nearby,  the Titanic was a lone ship, in the middle of the vast waters, filled with  helpless souls who had nowhere to go save too few lifeboats.

The harsh reality that dreadful day in 1912 is that most of the passengers  would die, and they knew it. Yet, amid the panic and impending doom, the  accounts of survivors remind us of a time when civility and honor were more  important to many than survival itself.

So how is it that in fewer than 100 years we have digressed to a society  where, when disaster strikes, the story is marked by a display of the worst  side of human nature rather than the best?

Could it be that in a pop culture where the gangsta style is "hip" and is  reflected and perpetuated in everything from violent rap and hip-hop music,  to the clothing styles, to the language and gestures used in "normal"  communication, to the negative attitudes toward females and children, that  the "style" isn't just a fashion trend but has actually become a way of life  for some? In other words, in a culture where many people dress like  gangstas, talk like gangstas, and strut like gangstas, should we be shocked  and horrified that they start engaging in gangsta crime when given the  opportunity?

I can't help but conclude that if the tragic natural disaster in New Orleans  had occurred in a culture that had daily practiced the Golden Rule, rather  than the Gangsta Rot, we would have seen more scenes of neighbors helping  neighbors and far fewer scenes of neighbors preying upon neighbors.

This is not to say that lawlessness ruled the past week in New Orleans. The  fact is, it didn't. The story of the flood is filled with heroic acts of  selflessness, and of desperate neighbor helping desperate neighbor even  while death loomed around them. And the amazing generosity from countless  Americans - in and near the disaster areas, as well as around the nation -  is a testament to the goodness of the American people.

Still, the raping and beating and pillaging and murdering that shocked the  world, for many now define not just New Orleans, but American culture.

It's time to ask ourselves a few obvious questions: Why do we as a nation  produce and embrace a pop culture that glorifies rap and hip-hop music, that  teaches men to prey upon women and engage in senseless violence, and that is  now, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation's recent survey on media and  youth, the number-one music choice of teenagers from all races and every  socio-economic status? Why is it that we produce, en masse, hedonistic  movies, television programs, and Internet content? Why is it that we  continue to make ever more graphic and violent video games for our children?  Why have we allowed such selfish messages to have such a powerful voice in  our culture?

Mind you, I'm not advocating government censorship, but rather pleading for  social and parental rejection to replace the current proliferation and  acceptance of such barbaric and destructive messages.

Other key questions - a bit different but entirely related - for the good  people of New Orleans and taxpayers everywhere to ask of Louisiana and  federal officials is: Why is it not only common knowledge but also accepted  practice that organized crime and gangs hold much of the power and control  much of the commerce in New Orleans? Will New Orleans return to business as  usual? Or will you uplift the entire community by throwing out the thugs and  their vile wares for which New Orleans is infamous? When you think about it,  the values of the thugs involved in the post-Katrina crime wave really  weren't all that different from those that have flooded sections of New  Orleans with societal sewage for years.

Once the immediate danger has passed and the cleanup has begun in earnest,  we must, as a nation, ask ourselves many questions. Along with the formal  investigations into what went wrong with the local, state and national  emergency plans (or lack thereof), we as citizens must also explore how our  failure to teach civility, decency and morality gravely compounded the  problems of an already horrific disaster.

The stories of the heroic figures of the Titanic and the civility that  marked their lives and culture should not be lost. Now is an excellent time  to use the lessons of history to build a better future for our children.

For more on the lessons of the Titanic, visit www.VisionForum.com and type  in “Titanic” under search.

Rebecca Hagelin is a vice president of The Heritage Foundation and the  author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture that's Gone  Stark Raving Mad.

First appeared on World Net Daily.

© 1995 - 2005 The Heritage Foundation

 

One disaster away from anarchy?
By Charles Moore
The Daily News (Halifax, NS)
Monday, September 5, 2005

A Daily News reader poll question last week, referencing the breathtakingly rapid and near-total breakdown of social and civil order in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, asked: “Is all civilization just one natural disaster away from the kind of anarchy seen in New Orleans and other parts of the Gulf Coast?”
Roughly two-thirds of respondents answered an unequivocal “yes,” one in five said “no,” and the remainder sat on the “maybe” fence. These polls are not scientific, but the indication is that a strong majority, whether out of cynicism or realism, have a pessimistic view of the ability of society to hold together when the bastions of infrastructure and law enforcement are breached.

Perhaps a more interesting question is “why?”

It applies in a much broader context than the aftermath of an extreme natural catastrophe. Even under ordinary circumstances, there has been massive deterioration in public civility, safety, and security over the past several decades. Nova Scotia Supreme Court Chief Justice Joseph Kennedy commented last week upon sentencing two women to prison terms for their role in a brutal and unprovoked swarming and near-fatal beating of a total stranger, about “gratuitous violence in this city (Halifax) particularly, that has become distressingly common,” and that is negatively affecting citizens’ senses of security and comfort.

A popular theory is that increasing violence and danger in society is attributable to economic disadvantage and social inequity, but that explanation doesn't hold up in historical context. For example, during the Great Depression of the 1930s, millions of people suffered through many years of relentless grinding poverty and hardship, but relatively few turned to crime and violence as an outlet for their frustration and misery. On the other hand, while it is hard to imagine much worse than what's going on in New Orleans this side of hell, one of the most stunning phenomena in that mind-numbing nightmare is how quickly civil order crumbled, and how thin the veneers of civility and human decency were shown to be.

Something relatively new in the evolution (or devolution) of our culture is evident here — a widespread cutting loose from the moral anchor and ethical compass that Christianity formerly represented in this society.

Postmodern culture is, in our social context, post-Christian culture. It is signalized by the poisonous notion that morality is relative, that there are no absolutes, and that nothing can be truly known. Its only creed is of indiscriminate tolerance of virtually anything except any sort of moral absolutism or definitive truth. It should be no surprise that such a climate of moral anarchy will result in behaviour of the sort witnessed in New Orleans this past week.

Civilization did not derive from “the goodness of individual human spirits” working in harmony for the common good, as humanists would have us believe. It is dependent upon honouring the objective moral laws of the created order, and in acknowledgment of the sovereignty and authority of God. A culture that rejects God and His law sets itself on a suicidal path into disorder and chaos.

The ethical principles traditionally held in common in Western culture were derived from Judeo-Christian moral teachings. Western civilization bloomed with the Christian religion, was sustained by it for some 1,500 years, and is withering with Christianity’s popular decline. It's probably fair to say that most people never lived strictly by Christian values, but until very recently a majority acknowledged them as the objective benchmarks of right and wrong; good and evil.

In an excellent December 1989 Atlantic Monthly essay, Glenn Tinder, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts, asked: “...can we be good without God? Can we affirm the dignity and equality of individual persons — values we ordinarily regard as secular — without giving them transcendental backing?” His answer was likely not. I agree.

“Enlightenment rationalism has translated certain Christian values into secular terms and, in an age becoming increasingly secular, has given them political force,” declared Tinder. “It is doubtful, however, that it could have created those values or that it can provide them with adequate metaphysical foundations. Hence, if Christianity declines and dies in coming decades, our moral universe and also the relatively humane political universe that it supports will be in peril.”

Tinder notes that “Many would like to think that there are no consequences — that we can continue treasuring the life and welfare, the civil rights and political authority, of every person without believing in a God who renders such attitudes and conduct compelling.”

He is doubtful. So am I. And New Orleans is an object lesson confirming the probity of our doubts.

Source: http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=1280&sc=5