US CULTURE
September 6, 2005
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed090605a.cfm
Throwing Out the
Thugs
"Women and
children first."
This famous, selfless cry for the safety of others is best associated with the tragedy of the Titanic, when thousands lost their lives in the frozen waters of the sea so many years ago. Not unlike the rising waters in New Orleans, where the ocean began to fill its natural territory after man-made walls that held it back for so long failed, so the mighty waters of the North Atlantic engulfed the damaged vessel that sought to defy nature's icebergs and open waters. But, unlike New Orleans where dry land was nearby, the Titanic was a lone ship, in the middle of the vast waters, filled with helpless souls who had nowhere to go save too few lifeboats.
The harsh reality that dreadful day in 1912 is that most of the passengers would die, and they knew it. Yet, amid the panic and impending doom, the accounts of survivors remind us of a time when civility and honor were more important to many than survival itself.
So how is it that in fewer than 100 years we have digressed to a society where, when disaster strikes, the story is marked by a display of the worst side of human nature rather than the best?
Could it be that in a pop culture where the gangsta style is "hip" and is reflected and perpetuated in everything from violent rap and hip-hop music, to the clothing styles, to the language and gestures used in "normal" communication, to the negative attitudes toward females and children, that the "style" isn't just a fashion trend but has actually become a way of life for some? In other words, in a culture where many people dress like gangstas, talk like gangstas, and strut like gangstas, should we be shocked and horrified that they start engaging in gangsta crime when given the opportunity?
I can't help but conclude that if the tragic natural disaster in New Orleans had occurred in a culture that had daily practiced the Golden Rule, rather than the Gangsta Rot, we would have seen more scenes of neighbors helping neighbors and far fewer scenes of neighbors preying upon neighbors.
This is not to say that lawlessness ruled the past week in New Orleans. The fact is, it didn't. The story of the flood is filled with heroic acts of selflessness, and of desperate neighbor helping desperate neighbor even while death loomed around them. And the amazing generosity from countless Americans - in and near the disaster areas, as well as around the nation - is a testament to the goodness of the American people.
Still, the raping and beating and pillaging and murdering that shocked the world, for many now define not just New Orleans, but American culture.
It's time to ask ourselves a few obvious questions: Why do we as a nation produce and embrace a pop culture that glorifies rap and hip-hop music, that teaches men to prey upon women and engage in senseless violence, and that is now, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation's recent survey on media and youth, the number-one music choice of teenagers from all races and every socio-economic status? Why is it that we produce, en masse, hedonistic movies, television programs, and Internet content? Why is it that we continue to make ever more graphic and violent video games for our children? Why have we allowed such selfish messages to have such a powerful voice in our culture?
Mind you, I'm not advocating government censorship, but rather pleading for social and parental rejection to replace the current proliferation and acceptance of such barbaric and destructive messages.
Other key questions - a bit different but entirely related - for the good people of New Orleans and taxpayers everywhere to ask of Louisiana and federal officials is: Why is it not only common knowledge but also accepted practice that organized crime and gangs hold much of the power and control much of the commerce in New Orleans? Will New Orleans return to business as usual? Or will you uplift the entire community by throwing out the thugs and their vile wares for which New Orleans is infamous? When you think about it, the values of the thugs involved in the post-Katrina crime wave really weren't all that different from those that have flooded sections of New Orleans with societal sewage for years.
Once the immediate danger has passed and the cleanup has begun in earnest, we must, as a nation, ask ourselves many questions. Along with the formal investigations into what went wrong with the local, state and national emergency plans (or lack thereof), we as citizens must also explore how our failure to teach civility, decency and morality gravely compounded the problems of an already horrific disaster.
The stories of the heroic figures of the Titanic and the civility that marked their lives and culture should not be lost. Now is an excellent time to use the lessons of history to build a better future for our children.
For more on the lessons of the Titanic, visit www.VisionForum.com and type in “Titanic” under search.
Rebecca Hagelin is a vice president of The Heritage Foundation and the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture that's Gone Stark Raving Mad.
First appeared on World Net Daily.
© 1995 - 2005 The Heritage Foundation
One
disaster away from anarchy?
By Charles Moore
The Daily News (Halifax, NS)
Monday, September 5, 2005
A Daily News reader poll question last week, referencing the breathtakingly
rapid and near-total breakdown of social and civil order in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina, asked: “Is all civilization just one natural disaster away
from the kind of anarchy seen in New Orleans and other parts of the Gulf
Coast?”
Roughly two-thirds of respondents answered an unequivocal “yes,” one in five
said “no,” and the remainder sat on the “maybe” fence. These polls are
not scientific, but the indication is that a strong majority, whether out of
cynicism or realism, have a pessimistic view of the ability of society to hold
together when the bastions of infrastructure and law enforcement are breached.
Perhaps a more interesting question is “why?”
It applies in a much broader context than the aftermath of an extreme natural
catastrophe. Even under ordinary circumstances, there has been massive
deterioration in public civility, safety, and security over the past several
decades. Nova Scotia Supreme Court Chief Justice Joseph Kennedy commented last
week upon sentencing two women to prison terms for their role in a brutal and
unprovoked swarming and near-fatal beating of a total stranger, about
“gratuitous violence in this city (Halifax) particularly, that has become
distressingly common,” and that is negatively affecting citizens’ senses of
security and comfort.
A popular theory is that increasing violence and danger in society is
attributable to economic disadvantage and social inequity, but that explanation
doesn't hold up in historical context. For example, during the Great Depression
of the 1930s, millions of people suffered through many years of relentless
grinding poverty and hardship, but relatively few turned to crime and violence
as an outlet for their frustration and misery. On the other hand, while it is
hard to imagine much worse than what's going on in New Orleans this side of
hell, one of the most stunning phenomena in that mind-numbing nightmare is how
quickly civil order crumbled, and how thin the veneers of civility and human
decency were shown to be.
Something relatively new in the evolution (or devolution) of our culture is
evident here — a widespread cutting loose from the moral anchor and ethical
compass that Christianity formerly represented in this society.
Postmodern culture is, in our social context, post-Christian culture. It is
signalized by the poisonous notion that morality is relative, that there are no
absolutes, and that nothing can be truly known. Its only creed is of
indiscriminate tolerance of virtually anything except any sort of moral
absolutism or definitive truth. It should be no surprise that such a climate of
moral anarchy will result in behaviour of the sort witnessed in New Orleans this
past week.
Civilization did not derive from “the goodness of individual human spirits”
working in harmony for the common good, as humanists would have us believe. It
is dependent upon honouring the objective moral laws of the created order, and
in acknowledgment of the sovereignty and authority of God. A culture that
rejects God and His law sets itself on a suicidal path into disorder and chaos.
The ethical principles traditionally held in common in Western culture were
derived from Judeo-Christian moral teachings. Western civilization bloomed with
the Christian religion, was sustained by it for some 1,500 years, and is
withering with Christianity’s popular decline. It's probably fair to say that
most people never lived strictly by Christian values, but until very recently a
majority acknowledged them as the objective benchmarks of right and wrong; good
and evil.
In an excellent December 1989 Atlantic Monthly essay, Glenn Tinder, Professor
Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts, asked:
“...can we be good without God? Can we affirm the dignity and equality of
individual persons — values we ordinarily regard as secular — without giving
them transcendental backing?” His answer was likely not. I agree.
“Enlightenment rationalism has translated certain Christian values into
secular terms and, in an age becoming increasingly secular, has given them
political force,” declared Tinder. “It is doubtful, however, that it could
have created those values or that it can provide them with adequate metaphysical
foundations. Hence, if Christianity declines and dies in coming decades, our
moral universe and also the relatively humane political universe that it
supports will be in peril.”
Tinder notes that “Many would like to think that there are no consequences —
that we can continue treasuring the life and welfare, the civil rights and
political authority, of every person without believing in a God who renders such
attitudes and conduct compelling.”
He is doubtful. So am I. And New Orleans is an object lesson confirming the
probity of our doubts.
Source: http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=1280&sc=5