Stable family helps education
A Marriage of Family
and Education
Stable Home Life Helps Children
Learn
NEW YORK, JAN. 14, 2006 (Zenit.org <http://www.zenit.org > ).- Family structure has a significant influence on children's educational performance. So says a recent study published by the Center for Marriage and Families, part of the New York-based Institute for American Values. The director of the center, Elizabeth Marquardt, gained wide attention earlier last year with a book she published on the effects of divorce on children.
The more-recent study
produced by the center is entitled "Family Structure
and Children's Educational Outcomes," a work that relies on an extensive review of recent academic research.
Family structure affects
all levels of educational performance, from preschool
to college, the brief argues. This is so because what happens in
the family has a big influence on a range of child behaviors, such as school
misbehavior, drug and alcohol consumption, sexual activity and teen
pregnancy, and psychological distress.
Over a 35-year span, the
proportion of children in the United States being
raised in two-parent homes has dropped significantly -- from about 85%
in 1968 to 70% in 2003 -- while the proportion of children living in single-parent
homes has nearly doubled. Before they reach the age of 18, most
U.S. children are likely to spend at least a significant portion of their
childhoods in a one-parent home.
Before going on to detail
the conclusions of research into the effects on
education, the policy brief took note of some problems with the methodology
of the studies.
Some studies define family
structure inconsistently, and others do not differentiate
between stepparents and biological parents. Other defects include
data taken from very small numbers of unmarried cohabiting parents,
or data for only one point in time.
Despite these limitations,
the research brief argued that a large body of
research clearly suggests that family structure significantly affects children's
academic and social development.
The first years
Three- and 4-year-olds
growing up with their own married parents are three
times less likely than those in any other family structure to experience
emotional or behavioral problems such as attention deficit disorder.
Overall, children living
with their own married parents have fewer behavioral
problems compared to children whose parents are living together
but not married. Differences in the area of physical health also
exist. Young children in single-parent families are less healthy overall
than are children in all other family types.
Moreover, children living
with their own married parents are more likely to
be involved in activities that help them learn to read than are children
from single-parent homes. These differences at such a young age can
establish behavior patterns in education that persist in later educational
levels, the study warned.
In primary school, the
ability of children to perform in basic subject areas
and at their grade level is weaker for those who don't live with their
own married parents. For example, fourth-graders with married parents
score higher on reading comprehension, compared to students living
in stepfamilies, with single mothers, and in other types of families.
Living in a single-parent family is also linked with decreases in
children's math scores.
To some extent the
financial penalties of living in a single-parent family
explains some of the negative results, but not all. The question of
marriage itself also has a measurable impact on these educational outcomes.
High school and beyond
Children growing up with
non-intact families engage in more adolescent misbehavior,
which harms grades and test scores. At this older age, the negative
consequences due to family structure are notably more serious. They
affect such matters as high school dropout rates, graduation rates, and
age at first pregnancy.
The brief explained that
studies carried out in both Sweden and the United
States show that children living in non-intact families do worse educationally.
In fact, each additional year a Swedish or an American child
spends with a single mother or stepparent reduces that child's overall
educational attainment by about one-half year.
The brief commented that
these similarities between U.S. and Swedish children
in non-intact families are particularly striking in light of these
two nations' dramatic differences in both family policy and in areas
such as income inequality.
When it comes to college,
adolescents from non-intact families continue to
pay a high price. It involves such negative consequences as lower college
attendance rates and acceptance at less-selective institutions.
As well, young people,
especially women, who grow up with their own married
parents tend to marry later. Research has shown a link between delayed
marriage and higher educational attainment among young women.
Problem behavior
The brief outlined a
number of negative behavior patterns more evident in
children from non-intact families.
-- Misbehavior at school.
Marital breakup is associated with a higher incidence
of anti-social behavior in the classroom for boys. Children from
homes headed by their own married parents have the fewest incidences of misbehavior at school.
-- School attendance and
tardiness. Students from non-intact families miss
school, are tardy, and cut class about 30% more often than do students
from intact homes. These differences exist in part because parents
in non-intact family homes appear less able to supervise and monitor
their children.
-- Smoking, illegal drugs,
and alcohol consumption. Teen-agers from non-intact
families are more likely to smoke, use drugs and consume alcohol,
even when controlling for important factors such as age, sex, race
and parent education. One study found that family structure had a significant
relationship to family attachment, with intact families reporting
higher levels of attachment. In turn, family attachment had a direct
and deterrent effect on adolescent cigarette smoking and illicit drug
use.
-- Sexual activity and
teen pregnancy. Teen-agers from non-intact families
are more likely to be sexually active. There appear to be no significant
differences in sexual behavior between adolescents from stepfamilies
and those from single-parent families. The similarity of sexual
behavior among these two groups of adolescents suggests that remarriage
presents some risks with regard to monitoring adolescent behaviors
effectively and transmitting values that deter early sexual relationships.
-- Illegal activities.
Being in a stepparent or single-parent family at age
10 more than doubles the odds of a child being arrested by age 14. One
study found that male adolescents in families without a biological father
were more likely to be incarcerated than teens from intact-family homes.
Young people who have never lived with their biological fathers have
the highest odds of being arrested.
-- Psychological problems.
For children, growing up without their own married
parents is linked with higher rates of stress, depression, anxiety,
and low self-esteem during the teen-age years -- problems that can
significantly reduce their ability to focus and achieve in school. Research
consistently shows that parental divorce has lasting negative emotional
effects throughout childhood, adolescence and adulthood.
The brief concludes with
recommendations for improving matters. For a start,
given that many children now grow up in non-intact families, programs
and policies should help families offset as best they can the negative
effects linked to these family structures.
More fundamentally, the brief concludes that education policy and family policy logically go hand in hand. And, if we want better-educated children, we need to strengthen families. Supporting marriage will allow a greater number of children to succeed educationally and flourish socially, the brief argued. A resolution worth recommending for the new year. ZE06011403