MEDICARE REFORM NEEDED
Reform key to fixing
'broken' medicare
By Rory Leishman
London Free Press
January 30, 2007
The Canadian health-care
system has many problems, but at least it shelters all Canadians from
catastrophic medical bills in the event of serious illness. The same, of course,
cannot be said for the United States, where literally millions of people -- some
estimates put the figure as high as 47 million -- have no health insurance.
Granted, several million of the uninsured in the U.S. are young people in good
health who can well afford private medical insurance, but choose instead to
spend their money on a fancy car or some other luxury. These people who gamble
with their health deserve little sympathy if a serious illness drives them into
bankruptcy.
Millions of other Americans want comprehensive medical insurance, but simply
cannot afford it. Federal and state governments provide comprehensive medical
care for the elderly, the disabled and poor children. Why, then, does the U.S.
not follow the Canadian lead, by outlawing private medical care insurance in
favour of a universal and comprehensive public system for all?
There is a good and sufficient answer to that question: The Canadian system is
heading for bankruptcy.
British Columbia Finance Minister Carole Taylor has documented the problem in
her province. In a report last September, she warned that if public spending on
medicare in B.C. were to continue to increase at recent annual rates, it would
absorb 71 per cent of the provincial budget by 2017. That's obviously out of the
question.
In a paper published Jan. 11, Brett Skinner of the Fraser Institute noted that
at least four other provincial government studies and a federal Senate report
also have concluded that the rate of increase in Canadian health-care spending
over the past several years is unsustainable.
Skinner has conducted his own study of the developing crisis. Based on figures
going back to 1975, he concludes: "Government health spending in six of the
10 provinces is on pace to consume more than half of total revenue by the year
2020, two-thirds by the year 2035, and all of provincial revenue by 2050."
Canada's medicare system is fiscally broken. As costs grow, the provinces cut
back services with the result that more and more Canadians have to put up with
progressively longer wait times for ever fewer treatments.
There can be no solution without fundamental reforms. Skinner argues that
Parliament and the provincial legislatures must, at the least, introduce
affordable co-payments by patients to curb frivolous demands on the public
system.
In this respect, Quebec is leading the way with a new law that will allow
private hospitals that receive public funding to charge extra fees to patients
for services covered by the province's public plan. In this way, the province
hopes to increase both the number and quality of services available to all
Quebecers.
In the U.S., President George W. Bush proposes to make private health insurance
more affordable with a tax deduction of $15,000 for family coverage and $7,500
for single coverage through a qualifying health-insurance plan. It would not
help millions with little or no taxable income. Several state governors have
proposed making adequate private coverage available to all, regardless of
income.
Switzerland already has such a plan: Thanks to government regulations and
subsidies tied to income, every Swiss resident can afford to buy a mandatory
health insurance plan from private firms.
A recent study by Britain's Civitas think-tank concluded: "Swiss attachment
to universality guarantees an extremely good quality of care to all with little
if any rationing."
Would that the same could be said about the Canadian medicare system. Is it any
coincidence the Swiss system encourages vigorous competition among private
medicare providers, while Canada is the world's only non-communist country with
a public-sector medicare monopoly that forbids purchase and sale of competing
private health insurance?