HETERO AIDS MYTH

April 14, 2005
 
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/Fumento20050414.shtml  
The African heterosexual AIDS myth  
Michael Fumento

Ninety-nine percent of AIDS and HIV cases in Africa come from sexual  transmission, virtually all heterosexual. So says the World Health  Organization, with other agencies toeing the line. Massive condom airdrops  accompanied by a persuasive propaganda campaign would practically make the  epidemic vanish overnight. Or would it?

A determined renegade group of three scientists has fought for years – with  little success – to get out the message that no more than a third of HIV  transmission in Africa is from sexual intercourse and most of that is anal.  By ignoring the real vectors, they say, we’re sacrificing literally millions  of people. These men are no crackpots. John Potterat is author of 140  scholarly publications. He began working for the El Paso County, Colorado  health department in 1972 and initiated the first U.S. partner-tracing  program for AIDS/HIV. Stuart Brody, soon to become a full professor in  Psychology at University of Paisley in Scotland, has published over 100  scholarly publications, including a book called “Sex at Risk.” Economist and  anthropologist David Gisselquist has almost 60 scholarly publications and is  currently advising the government of India on staunching its potentially  explosive AIDS epidemic.

These renegades note that one indicator the role of vaginal transmission is  overplayed in Africa is that it hasn’t played much of one in the U.S. Here  12% of AIDS cases are “attributed to” heterosexual transmission, meaning  victims claimed to have gotten it that way. Of these, over a third are  males. Yet San Francisco epidemiologist Nancy Padian evaluated 72 male  partners of HIV-infected women over several years, during which time only  one man became infected. Even in that case, there were “several instances of  vaginal and penile bleeding during intercourse.” So even the small U.S.  heterosexual figure appears grossly exaggerated.

The chief reason it’s so hard to spread HIV vaginally is that, as biopsies  of vaginal and cervical tissue show, the virus is unable to penetrate or  infect healthy vaginal or cervical tissue. Various sexually transmitted  diseases facilitate vaginal HIV infection, but even those appear to increase  the risk only slightly.

So if vaginal intercourse can’t explain the awful African epidemic, what  can? Surely it’s not homosexuality, since we’ve been told there is none in  Africa. In fact, the practice has long been widespread. For example, German  anthropologist Kurt Falk reported in the 1920s that bisexuality was almost  universal among the male populations of African tribes he studied. Medical  records also show that African men who insist they’re straighter than the  proverbial arrow often suffer transmissible anorectal diseases.

Yet almost certainly greater – and more controllable – contributors to the  African epidemic are “contaminated punctures from such sources as medical  injections, dental injections, surgical procedures, drawing as well as  injecting blood, and rehydration through IV tubes,” says Brody. There are  many indicators that punctures play a huge role in the spread of African  HIV/AIDS. For example, during the 1990s HIV increased dramatically in  Zimbabwe, even as condom use increased and sexually transmitted infections  rapidly fell. Or consider that in a review of nine African studies, HIV  prevalence in inpatient children ranged from 8.2% to 63% – as many as three  times the prevalence in women who’d given birth. If the kids didn’t get the  virus from their mothers, whence its origin?

Good people differ on exactly how much of the HIV in Africa is spread  vaginally – including our three renegades themselves. Nevertheless, their  findings readily belie the official figures. AIDS studies in Africa,  Potterat says, are “First World researchers doing second rate science in  Third World countries.” There’s no one reason for the mass deception. In  part, once a paradigm has been established it becomes much easier to justify  than challenge. “Only a handful [of researchers] are even looking at routes  other than sex,” notes Potterat. He also observes that grant donors seem  only interested in the sex angle. “Sex is sexy,” he says. Brody also points  out that for scientists to concede they were wrong would be “to admit they’  re complicit in mass death. That’s hard to admit that to yourself, much less  to other people.” True enough. But for the sake of millions in Africa and  other underdeveloped areas threatened by massive new infections, we’d better  admit it now.

Michael Fumento (fumento[at]pobox.com) is author of The Myth of Heterosexual  AIDS, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute, and a nationally syndicated  columnist with Scripps Howard News Service.

©2005 Michael Fumento  All site content © 1995-2005 Townhall.com